Expedia Group (EXPE) Free Cash Flow Analysis: Deep Dive into Travel's Cash Generation Machine

Analysis Date: February 8, 2026
Data Source: Stock Analysis / S&P Global Market Intelligence (FY 2020-2024 + TTM Sep 2025)
Analysis Period: 5 years + TTM (FY 2020 - FY 2024 + TTM Sep 2025)
Expedia Group Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) is a global online travel agency (OTA) operating within the Consumer Discretionary sector, powering brands including Expedia.com, Hotels.com, Vrbo, Orbitz, Travelocity, and Hotwire. With trailing twelve-month free cash flow surging to $2,998 million on a 20.86% FCF margin, Expedia demonstrates one of the most structurally advantaged cash conversion models in the consumer internet space. The company's asset-light platform model, combined with a negative working capital cycle driven by customer prepayments and deferred supplier settlements, creates a powerful cash generation flywheel that merits close examination. This comprehensive analysis examines 5 years of financial data plus the most recent trailing period to evaluate EXPE's cash generation quality, the structural drivers behind its exceptional working capital dynamics, and the cyclical risks that define its FCF profile.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or any recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. You should conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
📊 FCF Performance Summary
| Metric | TTM Sep '25 | FY 2024 | 5-Yr Avg (FY 2020-2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Cash Flow | $2,998M | $2,329M | $1,079M |
| FCF Margin | 20.86% | 17.01% | N/M* |
| FCF Growth (YoY) | +28.7% vs FY 2024 | +26.3% | - |
| Operating Cash Flow | $3,774M | $3,085M | $1,826M |
| Capital Expenditures | $776M | $756M | $747M |
| FCF Per Share | $22.40 | - | - |
*5-year average is distorted by FY 2020 COVID-driven FCF of -$4,631M. Excluding FY 2020, the 4-year average (FY 2021-2024) is $2,507M.
💰 Cash Generation Quality: HIGH QUALITY
- ✅ Operating Cash Flow: TTM OCF of $3,774M represents a 22.3% improvement over FY 2024's $3,085M, demonstrating accelerating operational momentum post-pandemic
- ✅ Cash Conversion: FCF/Net Income ratio of 216% means Expedia generates over twice as much cash as reported accounting profits — a hallmark of an asset-light, prepayment-driven model
- ✅ FCF Stability (Normalized): Excluding the FY 2020 pandemic anomaly, FCF has ranged from $1,844M to $3,075M — a consistent cash generation profile with an upward trajectory
- ⚠️ Cyclical Vulnerability: FY 2020 FCF of -$4,631M demonstrates that travel demand shocks can flip the cash generation model from extreme positive to extreme negative
🏦 Capital Allocation: BUYBACK-FOCUSED
Shareholder Returns (FY 2024):
- Share Buybacks: $1,839M (79% of FCF) — aggressive share count reduction as the primary capital return mechanism
- Dividends: $0 (0% of FCF) — Expedia does not pay a dividend, prioritizing buybacks and reinvestment
- Total Returned: $1,839M (79% of FCF) — a highly concentrated capital return strategy
Balance Sheet Positioning:
- Retained Cash: Approximately $490M retained from FY 2024 FCF after buybacks
- Capital Discipline: No dilutive acquisitions; organic platform investment focus
- No Dividend Commitment: Provides maximum flexibility to deploy FCF opportunistically
📈 5-Year + TTM Trend Analysis
Free Cash Flow Trajectory
FY 2020: -$4,631M ───┐ ← COVID devastation (-89% margin) FY 2021: $3,075M │ Pandemic rebound (+$7.7B swing) FY 2022: $2,778M │ Normalization (-9.7%) FY 2023: $1,844M │ Dip (-33.6%) FY 2024: $2,329M │ Recovery (+26.3%) TTM 9/25: $2,998M ────┘ ← New high ex-rebound (+28.7%)
Trend Assessment:
- Direction: Strong upward momentum — TTM FCF of $2,998M represents the highest cash generation since the FY 2021 pandemic rebound, and the highest on a normalized, sustainable basis
- The FY 2021 Anomaly: FY 2021's $3,075M FCF at a 35.76% margin reflects abnormally low CapEx and a massive working capital inflow as travel bookings surged from near-zero. This was a rebound spike, not a sustainable baseline
- FY 2022-2023 Slowdown: FCF declined from $2,778M to $1,844M as CapEx normalized, SBC increased, and the post-pandemic travel surge moderated — a concerning two-year deceleration
- Current Trajectory: The TTM $2,998M figure validates that the FY 2022-2023 slowdown was temporary. Expedia appears to have entered a new growth phase with expanding margins
| Period | FCF ($M) | OCF ($M) | CapEx ($M) | FCF Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTM Sep '25 | $2,998 | $3,774 | $776 | 20.86% |
| FY 2024 | $2,329 | $3,085 | $756 | 17.01% |
| FY 2023 | $1,844 | $2,690 | $846 | 14.36% |
| FY 2022 | $2,778 | $3,440 | $662 | 23.81% |
| FY 2021 | $3,075 | $3,748 | $673 | 35.76% |
| FY 2020 | -$4,631 | -$3,834 | $797 | -89.08% |
📊 FCF Margin Progression
The TTM margin of 20.86% represents a 386 basis point expansion over FY 2024's 17.01% and approaches the FY 2022 level (23.81%), but remains well below the FY 2021 pandemic-rebound outlier of 35.76%. Excluding the pandemic extremes (FY 2020 and FY 2021), the normalized margin trajectory shows consistent improvement: 23.81% (FY 2022) to 14.36% (FY 2023) to 17.01% (FY 2024) to 20.86% (TTM).
Key Insight: Expedia's 20.86% TTM FCF margin places it significantly above the broader Consumer Discretionary sector average (typically 8-12%). However, among pure online travel peers, it trails Booking Holdings (~33%) and Airbnb (~40-45%), suggesting margin expansion runway remains if the company can close the operational efficiency gap.
🔄 Operating Cash Flow: STRONG MOMENTUM
- Range (ex-FY 2020): $2,690M - $3,774M over the normalized period
- TTM Performance: $3,774M represents the highest OCF since the FY 2021 rebound ($3,748M), and on a more sustainable basis
- OCF/Revenue Margin: Approximately 26.3% TTM — demonstrating that for every dollar of revenue, Expedia converts over a quarter into operating cash
- Consistency: OCF has been positive every year since FY 2021, with a clear upward trajectory from $2,690M (FY 2023) to $3,774M (TTM)
🏗️ Capital Expenditures: REMARKABLY STABLE
- TTM Sep '25: $776M (20.6% of OCF)
- FY 2024: $756M (24.5% of OCF)
- FY 2023: $846M (31.4% of OCF — cycle high)
- FY 2022: $662M (19.2% of OCF — cycle low)
- FY 2021: $673M (18.0% of OCF)
- FY 2020: $797M (N/A — OCF was negative)
- Trend: CapEx has been extraordinarily stable in the $650-850M range, representing just 5-6% of revenue. This stability reflects Expedia's asset-light platform model where capital spending is almost entirely focused on technology and platform development rather than physical infrastructure
⚠️ FY 2020: The Pandemic Stress Test
Expedia's FY 2020 results represent the most extreme downside scenario for an online travel business. Revenue collapsed from $12.1B (FY 2019) to $5.2B, while OCF swung to -$3,834M. Critically, CapEx remained at $797M — Expedia still had to invest in its platform even with zero travel demand. This demonstrates that while Expedia is "asset-light" on the revenue side, it has a meaningful floor of required technology spending that cannot be reduced to zero, amplifying FCF losses during demand shocks.
🔍 FCF Components Deep Dive
Operating Cash Flow Composition (TTM Sep 2025)
| Component | Amount ($M) | % of OCF | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Income | $1,388 | 36.8% | Core earnings base |
| Depreciation & Amortization | +$208 | 5.5% | Non-cash charge (relatively low for asset-light model) |
| Other Amortization | +$671 | 17.8% | Intangible amortization (brand/technology acquisitions) |
| Stock-Based Compensation | +$386 | 10.2% | Non-cash employee compensation (watch for dilution) |
| Asset Writedown | +$114 | 3.0% | Impairments and write-offs |
| Working Capital Changes | +$1,017 | 26.9% | Major cash source — unearned revenue is key driver |
| Total OCF | $3,774 | 100% | Strong quality composition |
Quality Assessment: ✅ High Quality — Net income ($1,388M) forms the foundation, but the true power of Expedia's OCF lies in its non-cash add-backs ($879M from D&A and other amortization) and especially the massive working capital contribution of +$1,017M. This working capital inflow is not a one-time phenomenon — it is a structural feature of the OTA business model.
💰 Cash Conversion Metrics
| Metric | TTM Sep '25 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| FCF / Net Income | 216% | Generates 2.16x more cash than accounting profits |
| FCF / OCF | 79% | Low CapEx intensity — only 21% of OCF consumed by reinvestment |
| OCF / Net Income | 272% | Massive non-cash adjustments and WC benefits above net income |
Key Conversion Insights:
- ✅ FCF/Net Income of 216%: This is an exceptional ratio that places Expedia among the highest cash converters in the technology/internet sector. The gap between net income and FCF is driven by significant intangible amortization ($671M), SBC ($386M), and positive working capital dynamics ($1,017M)
- ✅ FCF/OCF of 79%: Only 21% of operating cash flow is consumed by capital expenditures — reflecting the asset-light nature of a platform business that requires no factories, warehouses, or heavy equipment
- ✅ OCF/Net Income of 272%: While a very high ratio, it warrants scrutiny. The $386M SBC add-back represents real economic cost (dilution) that inflates OCF relative to true cash earnings. Adjusting for SBC, the "quality-adjusted" OCF/NI would be approximately 244% — still excellent
Understanding the 216% FCF/NI Ratio: When a company generates significantly more cash than accounting profits, it typically means one of two things: (1) high non-cash charges that depress reported earnings but don't consume cash (positive), or (2) aggressive working capital management that may be unsustainable (requires scrutiny). In Expedia's case, it is primarily the former — $879M in amortization and $386M in SBC are real non-cash items — combined with a structurally favorable working capital model. This is a positive cash quality signal.
💰 The Unearned Revenue Engine: Expedia's Working Capital Advantage
The single most important structural driver of Expedia's cash generation is its negative cash conversion cycle. This section explains why this matters and how it works.
How the OTA Cash Cycle Works
The Fundamental Advantage: Customers pay Expedia when they book, but hotels and property owners are paid after the stay. This timing mismatch creates a permanent float of cash that Expedia holds, interest-free, between booking and check-out.
- Customer Books (Day 0): Traveler pays full amount upfront via credit card. Expedia records this as unearned revenue (a liability) — cash received but not yet "earned" until the stay occurs
- Cash Held (Day 0 to Day 30-90): Expedia holds the customer's cash during the period between booking and check-out. For advance bookings, this can be 30-90+ days of free float
- Stay Occurs (Day 30-90): The traveler checks in and completes their stay. Revenue is "earned" and recognized
- Supplier Paid (Day 45-120): Expedia settles with the hotel or property owner, typically on 15-30 day payment terms after the stay
The Result: Expedia operates with a negative cash conversion cycle. It collects cash before it needs to pay suppliers, creating a structural cash flow surplus that grows with booking volume.
Unearned Revenue: The Cash Flow Driver
| Working Capital Component | TTM Impact ($M) | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Unearned Revenue Change | +$1,673 | Primary cash flow driver — growing bookings = growing float |
| Other Working Capital | -$656 | Partially offsets unearned revenue (A/R timing, etc.) |
| Net Working Capital Impact | +$1,017 | 27% of total OCF comes from working capital |
Critical Observation: The $1,673M unearned revenue increase in TTM is the single largest contributor to Expedia's working capital cash inflow. This means that as Expedia grows its booking volume, it collects more prepayments from customers, creating an even larger cash float. This is a self-reinforcing cash generation cycle — growth directly feeds free cash flow.
Why This Matters for FCF Analysis: Unlike companies where working capital improvements are temporary or manipulable (stretching payables, accelerating collections), Expedia's working capital benefit is structural. As long as the company maintains or grows its booking volume, the unearned revenue float continues to generate positive working capital cash flows. This is the same economic model that benefits insurance companies (float from premiums) and subscription businesses (prepaid annual subscriptions).
⚠️ The Double-Edged Sword
The same mechanism that generates exceptional cash in growth periods works in reverse during downturns:
- ⚠️ FY 2020 Demonstration: When travel bookings collapsed, unearned revenue shrank as refunds were issued and no new bookings replaced the old. The working capital cycle that normally adds $1B+ to OCF instead consumed cash, contributing to the -$3,834M OCF
- ⚠️ Reflexive Risk: In a severe downturn, Expedia faces a triple hit — (1) revenue declines, (2) unearned revenue unwinds as refunds are issued, and (3) CapEx cannot be reduced to zero. This amplification effect is why FY 2020 FCF was -$4,631M
- ✅ Mitigating Factor: FY 2020 was a once-in-a-century event. Under normal recessionary conditions (e.g., 10-20% travel demand decline), the working capital model would moderate but not reverse entirely
📋 CapEx Breakdown and Asset-Light Model
Capital Expenditure Composition
Expedia's CapEx has been remarkably stable at $650-850M annually, representing just 5-6% of revenue. This is dramatically lower than asset-heavy businesses (hotels: 15-25%, airlines: 20-30%) and confirms the platform's asset-light economics.
| CapEx Category | Est. % of Total | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Technology & Platform | ~60-70% | Website/app development, search algorithms, AI/ML, cloud infrastructure |
| Capitalized Software | ~20-25% | Internal-use software development (capitalized labor costs) |
| Corporate & Other | ~10-15% | Office leasehold improvements, IT equipment, data centers |
Maintenance vs. Growth CapEx Estimate:
- Estimated Maintenance CapEx: ~$450-550M (60-70% of total) — required platform upkeep, security, regulatory compliance
- Estimated Growth CapEx: ~$200-300M (30-40% of total) — new features, geographic expansion, Vrbo platform integration, AI-powered personalization
⚠️ SBC as "Hidden" CapEx
Stock-based compensation of $386M (TTM) represents a meaningful economic cost that traditional FCF calculations do not deduct. If SBC were treated as a cash expense (which reflects its dilutive reality), "adjusted FCF" would be approximately $2,612M rather than $2,998M, and the adjusted FCF margin would be ~18.2% rather than 20.86%. While SBC is standard practice in the technology sector, its magnitude relative to net income ($386M SBC vs. $1,388M NI = 28% of earnings) warrants monitoring for dilution trends.
🎯 FCF Component Quality Scorecard
| Component | Rating | Key Strength | Key Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | 9/10 | Strong growth, $3.8B TTM, accelerating momentum | Cyclical exposure to travel demand |
| Capital Expenditures | 9/10 | Remarkably stable $650-850M, 5-6% of revenue | Cannot be reduced below ~$500M even in downturn |
| Working Capital | 10/10 | Structural advantage — negative cash conversion cycle | Reverses violently in demand shock (FY 2020) |
| Cash Conversion | 8/10 | 216% FCF/NI, 79% FCF/OCF — exceptional conversion | SBC inflates OCF; 28% of NI is non-cash comp |
| Overall FCF Quality | 7.5/10 | High quality with structural advantages | Cyclicality prevents higher score |
Score Rationale: The 7.5/10 reflects the tension between Expedia's exceptional structural cash conversion advantages (negative WC cycle, asset-light model, 216% FCF/NI) and the severe cyclicality demonstrated in FY 2020. A company that can swing from +$3.1B to -$4.6B in FCF within a single year — a $7.7 billion variance — carries inherent quality risk regardless of how strong its normal-period cash generation may be. The individual component scores (9, 9, 10, 8) reflect best-in-class characteristics, but the composite score is weighted down by the proven catastrophic downside scenario.
📊 Capital Allocation Deep Dive (FY 2024)
| Use of FCF | Amount ($M) | % of FCF |
|---|---|---|
| Share Buybacks | $1,839 | 79% |
| Dividends | $0 | 0% |
| Retained Cash / Other | ~$490 | 21% |
| Total FCF | $2,329 | 100% |
Buyback Effectiveness Analysis:
- ✅ Concentrated Returns: Allocating 79% of FCF to buybacks represents one of the most aggressive capital return programs among large-cap internet companies
- ✅ Share Count Reduction: The $1,839M in buybacks translates to meaningful per-share FCF accretion — TTM FCF per share of $22.40 reflects the reduced share count
- ⚠️ SBC Offset: With $386M in annual SBC, approximately 21% of the buyback spend is effectively just offsetting dilution from stock-based compensation rather than providing net share count reduction
- ⚠️ No Dividend Safety Net: The absence of a dividend means there is no "floor" on shareholder returns — in a downturn, buybacks can be halted entirely (as occurred in FY 2020), leaving shareholders with zero cash returns
Buyback Math: If Expedia spends $1,839M on buybacks but issues $386M in SBC, the net capital return is approximately $1,453M — still a robust 62% of FCF returned on a net basis. This "net buyback yield" is the more accurate measure of actual shareholder benefit.
🏢 Peer Comparison: Online Travel Agency Landscape
| Company | FCF Margin | Working Capital Model | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booking Holdings (BKNG) | ~33% | Negative CCC (similar) | Industry leader, highest margins, global dominance |
| Airbnb (ABNB) | ~40-45% | Negative CCC (extreme) | Highest margin OTA; pure marketplace model |
| Expedia Group (EXPE) | 20.86% | Negative CCC | Multi-brand strategy, Vrbo growth, broadest inventory |
| TripAdvisor (TRIP) | ~15-20% | Mixed | Smaller scale, ad-driven model, Viator experiences |
Competitive Positioning Assessment:
- ⚠️ Margin Gap to Leaders: Expedia's 20.86% FCF margin is substantially below Booking Holdings (~33%) and Airbnb (~40-45%). This reflects Expedia's higher cost structure — managing multiple brands (Expedia, Hotels.com, Vrbo, Orbitz, Travelocity, Hotwire) creates operational complexity and duplicated overhead that pure-play competitors avoid
- ✅ Improving Trajectory: The margin expansion from 14.36% (FY 2023) to 20.86% (TTM) suggests management's platform consolidation and cost optimization efforts are gaining traction. If the trend continues, Expedia could close the gap with BKNG over time
- ⚠️ Scale Disadvantage: Booking Holdings generates roughly 3x Expedia's OCF, providing significantly more firepower for technology investment, marketing spend, and competitive moats. In the OTA industry, scale begets scale through supplier negotiation leverage and customer acquisition efficiency
- ✅ Diversification Advantage: Expedia's multi-brand, multi-vertical approach (hotels, vacation rentals via Vrbo, flights, cruises, car rentals) provides broader exposure to the travel ecosystem than Airbnb's accommodation-focused model
🔮 Forward Outlook and Scenario Analysis
Scenario Analysis
| Scenario | Probability | FCF Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Bull Case | 30% | FCF grows to $3.5-4.0B as international travel recovery accelerates, Vrbo gains share in vacation rentals, corporate travel returns to pre-COVID levels, and platform consolidation drives margin expansion toward 25%+. Buybacks at current pace reduce share count by 5-7% annually. |
| Base Case | 50% | FCF stabilizes at $2.8-3.2B with steady 3-5% revenue growth, stable margins in the 19-22% range, and continued aggressive buybacks. The company maintains its competitive position but does not materially close the margin gap with BKNG/ABNB. |
| Bear Case | 20% | FCF contracts to $1.5-2.0B as macroeconomic recession reduces travel spending 15-25%, Google's direct booking features disintermediate OTAs, and SBC creep erodes cash quality. In a severe scenario (pandemic-level), FCF could again turn deeply negative. |
🎯 Key Catalysts to Monitor
- Unearned Revenue Growth: The single most important forward indicator for Expedia's FCF. Rising unearned revenue signals growing bookings and expanding cash float. A deceleration or decline would be an early warning of FCF pressure
- Vrbo Integration Progress: Management has invested heavily in consolidating Vrbo onto the unified Expedia platform. Successful integration would reduce costs and improve margins; delays or execution missteps would pressure the expense side
- Google Disintermediation Risk: Google's expanding travel features (Google Hotels, Google Flights) pose a long-term existential threat to OTA margins by reducing the need for intermediaries. Monitor Expedia's traffic acquisition costs and direct booking share
- Corporate Travel Recovery: Business travel remains below pre-COVID levels. A meaningful recovery would provide incremental revenue with high margins (corporate bookings tend to be higher value and more last-minute)
- SBC Trajectory: At $386M (28% of net income), SBC is a material dilution risk. Monitoring the ratio of SBC growth relative to revenue and earnings growth reveals whether management is maintaining discipline or accelerating dilution
- International Expansion: Expedia has historically been U.S.-centric relative to Booking Holdings. Expanding international share — particularly in Asia-Pacific and Latin America — represents a significant revenue growth opportunity
⚖️ FCF Quality Assessment: Strengths and Risks
Strengths
- Exceptional FCF Momentum: TTM FCF of $2,998M represents a +57% increase over FY 2023's $1,844M and +29% over FY 2024's $2,329M. This is not just recovery — it is acceleration, driven by improving OCF margins and stable CapEx
- Structural Cash Advantage: The negative working capital cycle (customers prepay, suppliers paid later) creates a self-reinforcing cash generation flywheel that grows with booking volume. The $1,673M unearned revenue increase in TTM demonstrates this engine at full power
- Asset-Light Capital Efficiency: CapEx of just 5-6% of revenue means that the vast majority of OCF falls directly to FCF. Expedia's 79% FCF/OCF conversion rate is among the highest in the consumer internet sector
- Aggressive Buyback Program: The 79% FCF-to-buyback allocation demonstrates management confidence in the sustainability of cash generation and provides meaningful per-share value accretion
- Post-COVID Competitive Strengthening: Expedia emerged from the pandemic with a more consolidated brand portfolio, reduced cost structure, and improved technology platform — structural improvements that should persist through the cycle
Considerations
- Cyclicality Is an Existential Risk: FY 2020's -$4,631M FCF demonstrates that in a severe demand shock, the same mechanisms that generate exceptional cash in good times (unearned revenue float, high operating leverage) reverse to destroy cash at an alarming rate. The $7.7 billion FCF swing from FY 2020 to FY 2021 is the widest variance in this analysis
- Booking Holdings Dominance: BKNG's ~33% FCF margin and significantly larger scale create a structural competitive advantage that Expedia has struggled to match. In a commoditizing marketplace, the scale leader typically wins on both margin and customer acquisition cost
- Disintermediation Threat: Google's expanding direct booking capabilities, hotel chains' investment in direct loyalty programs, and Airbnb's brand strength all threaten to reduce the structural demand for OTA intermediaries over time
Risk Factors
- FY 2022-2023 Slowdown Was Recent: The decline from $2,778M (FY 2022) to $1,844M (FY 2023) — a 33.6% drop — occurred during a period of strong travel demand, raising questions about whether Expedia-specific execution issues contributed to the underperformance
- SBC Creep: At $386M annually, stock-based compensation represents 28% of net income and 13% of FCF. If SBC grows faster than revenue, it erodes the quality of reported FCF by diluting existing shareholders more than buybacks can offset
- Macroeconomic Sensitivity: Travel is among the most discretionary categories of consumer spending. In a recession, consumers cut travel budgets before almost any other category, making Expedia's revenue and FCF highly correlated with consumer confidence and employment trends
✅ Conclusion
Expedia Group's TTM free cash flow of $2,998 million, with a 20.86% margin and 7.5/10 FCF Quality Score, reflects a structurally advantaged cash generation model powered by the online travel industry's negative working capital cycle and asset-light economics. Use our FCF yield calculator to compare EXPE's yield to other travel stocks.
The analysis reveals a company with exceptional cash conversion characteristics across multiple dimensions: a 216% FCF/Net Income ratio driven by substantial non-cash amortization and structural working capital benefits, a 79% FCF/OCF conversion rate reflecting minimal capital reinvestment requirements, and an accelerating growth trajectory that has pushed TTM FCF to its highest sustainable level. The $1,673M unearned revenue increase — the single largest driver of working capital cash flow — demonstrates that Expedia's booking volume growth translates directly into cash generation, creating a self-reinforcing flywheel effect.
FCF Quality Assessment: The 7.5/10 FCF Quality Score reflects the balance between Expedia's best-in-class structural cash advantages (negative working capital cycle, asset-light platform, strong conversion ratios) and the severe cyclical vulnerability that FY 2020 exposed. Individual component scores of 9/10 (OCF), 9/10 (CapEx), 10/10 (Working Capital), and 8/10 (Cash Conversion) demonstrate that under normal operating conditions, Expedia's cash generation characteristics are among the strongest in the consumer internet space. However, the proven ability for FCF to swing by $7.7 billion in a single year — and the amplification effect of the working capital model in a downturn — imposes a meaningful quality discount that prevents a higher composite score.
Key Characteristics:
- ✅ Exceptional Cash Conversion — 216% FCF/NI ratio demonstrates the power of the asset-light, prepayment-driven model
- ✅ Structural Working Capital Advantage — Negative cash conversion cycle generates $1B+ annually from the unearned revenue float
- ✅ Accelerating FCF Momentum — TTM $2,998M is +57% above FY 2023, representing the highest sustainable FCF in company history
- ✅ Aggressive Capital Returns — 79% of FCF deployed to buybacks, providing meaningful per-share value accretion
- ⚠️ Severe Cyclical Vulnerability — FY 2020's -$4,631M FCF demonstrates that the cash generation model reverses violently in demand shocks
- ⚠️ Competitive Margin Gap — 20.86% FCF margin trails BKNG (~33%) and ABNB (~40-45%), indicating structural efficiency disadvantage
- ⚠️ SBC Dilution — $386M annual SBC (28% of NI) partially offsets the buyback program and inflates reported cash conversion metrics
Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other type of advice. You should not make any investment decision based solely on this analysis. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal.
Data Sources: Stock Analysis / S&P Global Market Intelligence, Expedia Group FY 2020-2024 financial filings + TTM Sep 2025
Methodology: Analysis of 5 years + TTM cash flow statement data with focus on FCF quality, component analysis, working capital dynamics, and capital allocation patterns